Defense Lawyers For 9/11 Detainees Challenge Bias And Political Influence At Guantánamo Proceedings This Week (9/22/2008)
ACLU And NACDL Appear At Hearings As Civilian Legal Advisors
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
GUANTÁNAMO BAY, Cuba – Appearing before a Guantánamo military commission
today, military attorneys and civilian lawyers sponsored by the American Civil
Liberties Union's John Adams Project sought to interject a degree of fairness
into the deeply flawed system. Among several requests, defense lawyers are
asking that all charges be dismissed against the detainees accused of crimes
related to the 9/11 attacks because of a history of political interference from
Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann, a top Pentagon general.
Last Friday, the Department of Defense announced that Hartmann will be
"reassigned" to a newly created post – director of court logistics – and
replaced by his deputy as the military commissions' legal advisor. Pledging to
prosecute detainees at a quick pace, Hartmann said that his goal in his new post
is "to keep the process moving, really intensely," an objective that raises
questions about trials that cut corners, deny basic fairness and are aimed at
convictions rather than uncovering the truth.
"General Hartmann is essentially saying that he will use his authority to run
roughshod over these proceedings and deny even the semblance of a fair trial,"
said Denny LeBoeuf, Director of the ACLU John Adams Project, a partnership with
the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) to provide civilian
lawyers to supplement the under-resourced military defense counsel. "The
American people are being denied a fair and open process of adjudication."
In legal papers filed before Hartmann's reassignment, defense lawyers had
asked that he be removed from the cases for exerting "unlawful command
influence" or that the cases be dismissed. Hartmann's dual role of supervising
the prosecution and offering legal advice to the commissions' convening
authority, who must make impartial assessments on issues raised by both the
prosecution and defense, represented a clear conflict of interest. Hartmann has
already been dismissed from three other military commission cases after
improperly politicizing them, including that of Salim Hamdan, Osama bin Laden's
driver, whose Guantánamo trial concluded in August. The lawyers argued that the
cases should still be dismissed because the fairness of the process has already
been compromised.
The defense lawyers are also arguing that the convening authority must allow
the defense the ability to hire expert consultants or witnesses without first
notifying the prosecution about the substance of their requests. Currently, the
defense teams must clear each request for expert consultants – including the
details of and strategy for their proposed retention – with the prosecution.
This practice is typically not required in military courts.
"It is too late to level this playing field. From day one, these flawed
commissions, which allow for hearsay, secret evidence and evidence obtained
through torture, have stacked the deck in favor of the Bush administration. Once
you look at this system, you see that it has no integrity – rules are biased and
there is a vast disparity of resources between the government and the defense,"
said LeBoeuf. "The prosecution has all of the resources of the federal
government behind it and, by its own claim, has conducted the 'largest criminal
investigation in United States history.' But the defense is supposed to disclose
a detailed description of their legal strategy to the prosecution in order to
get an expert witness?"
Also at this week's proceedings, which are expected to continue into Tuesday,
defense lawyers will follow up with questions of the judge in order to determine
his objectivity.
In another example of the secrecy surrounding the Guantánamo proceedings,
legal documents related to these and other hearings, normally a matter of public
record in traditional courts, are unavailable for release due to military
commission rules.
More information on the ACLU and NACDL's John Adams Project is available
online at: www.aclu.org/johnadams
|