Expanding Border Powers Creating ‘Constitution-Free Zone’ That Covers Two-Thirds of Americans (10/22/2008)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (202)
675-2312; media@dcaclu.org
WASHINGTON – The extraordinary
powers of customs and border agents to invade the privacy of individuals at the
U.S. border are spreading
inland and creating what amounts to a “Constitution-free Zone” that covers fully
two-thirds of the American population, the American Civil Liberties Union said
today in a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC.
“The authorities can do things at
the border that they could never do to citizens and residents inside our country
under the Constitution,” said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU
Washington Legislative Office. “Yet the government is asserting that some of
these powers extend as far as 100 miles inside the actual border. It is a
classic example of law enforcement powers expanding far beyond their proper
boundaries – in this case, literally.”
At the press conference, the ACLU
released a map showing the 100-mile “border region” claimed by the government,
and cities and states that fall within it. The map, which was created using the
latest census data, shows that fully two-thirds of the U.S.
population, including 9 of the nation’s top 10 largest metro areas, is within
the border zone.
“Americans and Washington policymakers may believe that this is a problem
confined to the dusty sands of Arizona or
Texas, or the San Diego-Tijuana border, but it
stretches far inland across the United States,” said Barry
Steinhardt, director of the ACLU’s Technology and Liberty Program. “If allowed
to stand, sooner or later a factory worker in southern New Hampshire, a farmer
in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, or Joe the plumber outside Toledo, Ohio
will find themselves trapped in a Constitution-free Zone.”
Also appearing at the press
conference were two individuals who spoke about their personal experience with
these overextended powers:
San Diego music professor Craig Johnson,
and Vince Peppard, a San Diego retiree who with
his wife was stopped by the authorities on a road east of San Diego, at least 15 miles from the U.S.
border. Peppard and his wife proved they were U.S.
citizens but still found themselves subject to demands that they allow a search,
interrogated, threatened and harassed.
“Now I’m actually feeling nervous
when I’m going to work. . . that I might get pulled over by Border Patrol and
asked, ‘where’s your passport?’” said Peppard, who appeared at the event via
videotape. “And now – do I have to carry my passport with me when I go to Home
Depot or something?”
“In the United
States, citizens are not supposed to need an
internal passport,” said Steinhardt. “This is our country and we are free to go
where we please, without being stopped and interrogated by the authorities, as
long as we are not behaving illegally or in a way that is clearly
suspicious.”
“Police action is not the only way
to fight for freedom,” said Fredrickson. “This is a classic case where Americans
need to push back against their government to preserve the core freedoms that we
have always enjoyed.”
An interactive version of the
“Constitution-free Zone” map, a video of Vince Peppard, and other materials are
available at: www.aclu.org/constitutionfreezone
# # #
|