MCLU Argues Against Police Brutality (11/3/2008)
Urges Appeals Court to Reverse Earlier Ruling
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: info@mclu.org
PORTLAND — Tomorrow, attorneys for Rosanna Morelli will present arguments in
her police brutality case at the U. S. Court of Appeals in Boston. Ms. Morelli,
who was injured by a South Portland police officer in 2006, hopes to persuade
the court to allow her case to go to trial. The police never arrested Ms.
Morelli, who suffered from a torn rotator cuff from the incident.
"If the police don't follow the law, it breeds disrespect for law in the
public," said Zachary Heiden, Legal Director of the Maine Civil Liberties Union
Foundation, who will argue on behalf of Ms. Morelli. "We're asking the court to
police the police because in our country, nobody is above the law."
Before the altercation with the police, Ms. Morelli earned a living as an
exotic dancer and entertainer. The police hired Ms. Morelli as part of a
prostitution sting operation, but she refused police temptation to violate the
law. When Ms. Morelli realized that the police were trying to entrap her, she
decided to leave. That is when the officer grabbed her arm, and shoved her
against a wall, holding her there for a number of minutes, before being told
that she was free to go. She never broke the law and never faced any charges in
the incident.
"Violence against women continues to be a terrible problem," said Shenna
Bellows, Executive Director of the MCLU. "Women are encouraged to go to the
police when they have been the victims of violence, but it will be hard for
women to trust the police if issues like this are not addressed."
In finding for the police, the U.S. District Court in Portland held that
trial on constitutional violations by the police officer was not appropriate
because the officer was shielded by "qualified immunity", which protects
government actors from reasonable—but mistaken—violations of civil rights. Ms.
Morelli's attorneys will attempt to persuade the appeals court that the
constitutional violations were severe enough that the case should be allowed to
proceed to trial.
Arguments in the Appeals Court in Boston are scheduled for Tuesday morning at
10 a.m. The case in the U.S. Court of Appeals is Docket 08-1759. In addition to
Mr. Heiden, the appellant is represented by Barbara Goodwin of the law firm
Murray, Plumb & Murray.
|