ACLU Says Mayor Gordon’s Immigration Scheme Will Erode Immigrants' Willingness to Cooperate With Police (12/12/2007)
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: media@aclu.org
PHOENIX – In a letter sent today to Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon, the
American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona urged the mayor to abandon plans to
use local police to enforce complex immigration laws, saying the proposal is a
sure-fire way to reduce immigrants' willingness to cooperate with authorities in
the fight against crime.
"Enforcing immigration law is a full-time and highly
technical matter and should not be the part-time obligation of our already
overburdened local police," said Daniel Pochoda, Legal Director of the ACLU of
Arizona. "Immigrants are not going to be overly thrilled about cooperating with
police if they fear arrest for minor immigration violations."
On
December 3, Mayor Phil Gordon announced a plan to reverse the long-standing
tradition of leaving immigration-related criminal matters in the hands of the
federal government. He said he no longer supported Operations Order 1.4, which
prevents police in most cases from asking about a person's immigration status.
Gordon’s move comes at the heels of mounting pressure from advocates for
stricter immigration laws, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, who has
been all too willing to use immigration law as a pretext to target Latino
communities, the ACLU said.
In
its two page letter to Mayor Gordon, the ACLU points out that proposed policy
change is unnecessary because Phoenix police officers can and do enforce
criminal laws against anyone who violates them, regardless of immigration
status.
“We expect the Phoenix Police Department to cooperate with
federal authorities in apprehending anyone, including non-citizens, who are
suspected of criminal activity,” added Pochoda. “However, officers should
not be in the business of detaining or arresting law-abiding aliens based solely
on their immigration status or on perceived violations of civil immigration
laws.”
Not surprisingly, local police departments across the state
are wary about what local enforcement of immigration laws will mean for their
overstretched budgets. Police in Mesa,
Pima
County,
Santa
Cruz
County, and Tucson Police Departments have made it clear that
they will not participate in any immigration law enforcement, arguing it would
add an unnecessary financial burden on their already overburdened budgets. In
addition, most police departments in other big cities, including
New York, Chicago,
Houston, Los
Angeles and
San
Francisco bar officers
in most cases from asking a person’s immigration status or detaining him or her
for the sole purpose of determining it.
“This opens the door to possible abuse and potential civil
rights violations, because it forgets an important fact: you can’t tell by looks
alone who is a citizen and who is not,” said ACLU of Arizona Executive Director
Alessandra Soler Meetze. “We know from experience that this will lead to the
detention or questioning of many U.S.
citizens and lawful permanent residents, resulting in class-action suits and
findings of liability against the City of Phoenix.”
|